Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 11:16

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
What are the gifts you got when you cleared JEE ?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How conservative the Japanese people really is? And the government?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Weather makers: How microbes living in the clouds affect our lives - BBC
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How much higher are McDonald's prices going to go?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Corbin Carroll Diagnosed With Wrist Fracture - MLB Trade Rumors
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Here's a fresh look at Clockwork Revolution, coming "in due time" - Eurogamer
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Dermot Mulroney Files for Divorce From Prima Apollinaare After 14 Years - TMZ